COMBINED CONTRIBUTION OF PU FOAM AND GYPSUM FIBRE SHEATHING ON THE BEHAVIOUR OF LIGHTWEIGHT STEEL C- PROFILE IN A COMPOSITE WALL PANEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31650/2707-3068-2025-29-34-40Keywords:
Light steel frame, composite wall panel, polyurethane foam, load-bearing capacity, failure modeAbstract
The research focuses on evaluating the mechanical contribution of the PU foam and
sheathing to the load-bearing capacity, stiffness, and failure modes of the LSF system. Two groups of specimens were tested under axial compression: (1) bare LSF structures consisting solely of cold-formed C-profiles, and (2) composite panels consisting of the same LSF frame, a PU foam core injected under pressure, and external gypsum fibreboard sheathing. The experimental results demonstrate a substantial enhancement in structural performance due to composite action. Composite panels achieved an average load-bearing capacity of 316.7 kN, more than double that of the bare LSF structures, which averaged 133.4 kN. In addition, the composite panels exhibited significantly higher ductility, with average vertical displacements at peak load reaching 10.27 mm, compared to 5.43 mm for the LSF frames. The initial stiffness of the composite system was also markedly improved, reaching 45.76 kN/mm approximately 1.5 times greater than that of the LSF structure alone. The PU foam, injected in a controlled industrial process, ensures a uniform and firm bond with both the steel frame and the sheathing, enabling effective composite action and resistance to local and global buckling. Visual inspection and load-displacement analysis confirmed that while the bare LSF structures failed by local and out-of-plane buckling, the composite panels maintained stability and failed primarily through localized crushing, without global loss of structural integrity. These findings underscore the structural benefits of using composite panel systems and provide a foundation for the development of design models and future standardization of this type of construction element.
References
[1] Mousavi, S.A.; Zahrai, S.M.; Bahrami-Rad, A. Quasi-static cyclic tests on super-lightweight EPS concrete shear walls. Eng. Struct. 2014, 65, 62–75.
[2] Xu, Z.; Chen, Z.; Osman, B.H.; Yang, S. Seismic performance of high-strength lightweight foamed concrete-filled cold-formed steel shear walls. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2018, 143, 148–161.
[3] Hegyi, P.; Dunai, L. Experimental study on ultra-lightweight-concrete encased cold-formed steel structures Part I: Stability behaviour of elements subjected to bending. Thin-Walled Struct. 2016, 101, 75–84.
[4] Miller, H.T.; Pekoz, T. Behavior of Cold-Formed Steel Wall Stud Assemblies. J. Struct. Eng. 1993, 119, 641–651.
[5] Tian, Y.; Wang, J.; Lu, T.; Barlow, C. An experimental study on the axial behaviour of cold-formed steel wall studs and panels. Thin-Walled Struct. 2004, 42, 557–573.
[6] Wang, J.; Tian, Y.; Lu, T. The role of frame members and sheathing in partition wall panels subjected to compression. Thin-Walled Struct. 2005, 43, 983–1002.
[7] Bakran, A.; Krolo, P.; Lukačević, L.; Palijan, I. Experimental Investigation of the CFS-PU Composite Wall Panel under Axial Compression. Buildings 2023, 13, 1897. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13081897




