COMPARISON OF THE METHODS OF PENETRATION OF THE ENEMY'S AIR ATTACK MEANS IN REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES PROTECTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31650/2707-3068-2024-28-75-84Abstract
On the basis of the literature review, trends in the development of studies of
engineering protection of critical infrastructure objects were revealed. The review of scientific works
revealed the direction of improving the physical and mechanical properties of building protective
structures. It is noted that large-scale experimental and theoretical studies of reinforced concrete
structures and reinforced concrete protective plates with the use of fiber were carried out.
Experimental and theoretical studies of reinforced concrete protective structures on the impact of
rockets and the subsequent explosion have been identified and summarized. The study of structures
using different materials is shown. It was determined that one of the promising directions is the use
of multilayer composite structures. The results of experimental studies by various authors were
analyzed and it was concluded that air damage impacts should be classified into 4 categories: an
impact, a soft impact, a hard impact of a projectile with a steel shell; a semi-solid impact is the impact
of a missile whose outer shell is made of a composite material or a thin-walled titanium alloy. The
authors also draw attention to the possibility of studying an all-plastic impact - the impact of a
concrete-piercing warhead of a missile with a 20-22 mm titanium body, the impact is accompanied
by the development of plastic deformations in the shell during penetration into the composite
reinforced concrete layer. An overview of the main methods of calculating the penetration of combat
units during an impact on defensive structures was carried out. The formulas of the main methods are
based on the results of experimental and theoretical studies NDRC. Effects of impact and explosion.
Summary Technical Report Division 2, 1, National Defense Research Committee, Washington, DC,
1946". A generalized conclusion is made regarding the use of the modified NDRC (USA) method for
evaluating experimental studies.




