SELECTING THE RATIONAL PITCH OF BEAMS FLOORING FOR THE BEAM CAGE OF A SIMPLIFIED TYPE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31650/2707-3068-2019-23-96-103Abstract
The article presents the results of optimizing the pitch of beams in a beam cage of a
simplified type, when steel beams of an I-beam profile are supported on vertical supporting
structures (walls, columns). Steel flooring is laid on them.
The optimal pitch of the beams is selected so that the total consumption of steel on the beams
and flooring is minimal. For this purpose, the objective function of the cost of steel for the flooring
and beams per 1 m2 of flooring is compiled, the argument of which is the step of the beams. This
function was investigated for extremum. The thickness of the flooring was adopted corresponding
to the limiting ratio of the pitch of the beams to this thickness from the stiffness condition. It is
accepted that two identical shelves and a wall of an I-beam have the form of rectangles. Moreover,
the height of the beam is optimal and corresponds to the minimum cost of steel.
When deriving the formula for the optimal beam pitch, it was assumed that the beam cross-
section is selected based on ensuring strength at normal stresses. In this case, the stiffness of the
beam at the optimal pitch may not be provided. Therefore, a study was conducted for what values of
the pitch, the rigidity of the beam is ensured when the left and right parts of the strength condition
are equal to normal stresses. It relied on the solution of the system of equations of strength and
stiffness, which made it possible to obtain a formula for the minimum beam pitch from the stiffness
condition.
It was found out in which case, when the optimum pitch of the beams was found, its rigidity
was ensured. For this, it is necessary that the flexibility of the beam wall should be at least a certain
value. A formula is obtained for this minimum value. Her analysis showed that such flexibility is
proportional to the design resistance of the steel to the sixth degree, that is, it grows very rapidly
with increasing this resistance. Therefore, in order to ensure the rigidity of the beams at their
optimal pitch, the strength of the steel should be sufficiently small. It turned out that there is a
fundamental possibility to choose the step of the beams, which corresponds to the minimum cost of
overlap.
In order to clarify the practical applicability of the results, the problem was solved with
control numerical data. The results confirmed the conclusion that low-strength steel should be used.
In addition, it turned out that the problem makes sense with relatively large spans of beams.




